Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

a10 or fx6300

Tags:
  • GPUs
  • Processors
  • CPUs
  • HD
  • AMD
Last response: in CPUs
June 11, 2013 4:41:29 AM

hello everyone, i would like to ask if i will choose fx6300 processor +msi 880gms e-41 with onboard GPU HD4250 to amd a10 5800k processor with integrated radeon hd 7660d gpu.. i dont have yet mother board to pair with a10 5800k processor.. my budget is to small.. please enlighten me,, thanks

More about : a10 fx6300

a b à CPUs
a b À AMD
June 11, 2013 4:49:23 AM

What's your purpose with this new build? If it's for gaming then the A10 is better. If it's for CPU-intensive tasks then the FX6300 leads by a huge amount ( A10's CPU performance is only equals to a FX4130 ).

You should also double check the 880gms e-41 you have, since it might not be the version with AM3+ CPUs support.
    m
    0
    l
    June 11, 2013 5:53:38 AM

    Madn3ss795 said:
    What's your purpose with this new build? If it's for gaming then the A10 is better. If it's for CPU-intensive tasks then the FX6300 leads by a huge amount ( A10's CPU performance is only equals to a FX4130 ).

    You should also double check the 880gms e-41 you have, since it might not be the version with AM3+ CPUs support.


    yes sir for gaming only.. yes sir 880gms e-41 support am3+ socket.. and why you choose A10 5800k to Fx 6300? i have read lots of topic here about fx6300 vs a10 5800k,, and they say fx6300 is the best that why i create new topic with their features like integrated GPU of a10 5800k.. in the future upgrade.. like i buy sapphire HD7870 video card.. which processor i will choose?? thanks for the quick response
      m
      0
      l
      a b à CPUs
      a b À AMD
      June 11, 2013 6:02:46 AM

      FX 6300 is better for gaming when teamted with a discrete graphic card. Therefor it would win over the 5800k if you intend to put in a HD7870 or even much weaker cards like a HD7750 later. The 5800k wins gaming conditions in which only the IGPs are used, since its HD7660D is on par with a discrete GT630 graphic card.

      Therefor, grab the fx6300 if you find the hd4250 acceptable for now and have the will to add in a strong discrete VGA card later. Only get 5800k if you can't wait any longer and want decent gaming performance right now.

      And no, don't call me a Sir, I'm not even from British :p 
        m
        0
        l
        a c 210 à CPUs
        a b À AMD
        June 11, 2013 6:10:17 AM

        If you're going to add a HD 7870 later...then get the FX6300.
          m
          0
          l
          June 11, 2013 7:26:56 AM

          Go for fx6300 and discrete graphic card.
            m
            0
            l
            June 14, 2013 2:21:28 PM

            qrad said:
            Go for fx6300 and discrete graphic card.


            +1

            To give you an idea what an FX-6300 can do for you ponching27, mine's clocked at 4.8Ghz using a h80i aio water cooler on a 990FXA-UD5 board. Using a Sapphire 7970 Ghz at stock speeds I'm averaging 70-75fps in BF3 set on Ultra.
              m
              0
              l
              a b à CPUs
              June 14, 2013 4:57:24 PM

              andycal said:
              qrad said:
              Go for fx6300 and discrete graphic card.


              +1

              To give you an idea what an FX-6300 can do for you ponching27, mine's clocked at 4.8Ghz using a h80i aio water cooler on a 990FXA-UD5 board. Using a Sapphire 7970 Ghz at stock speeds I'm averaging 70-75fps in BF3 set on Ultra.


              Not everyone can afford an H80i. For that kind of money you'd be better off with an FX 8320 and Hyper 212 EVO.
                m
                0
                l
                June 14, 2013 6:27:03 PM

                montosaurous said:
                andycal said:
                qrad said:
                Go for fx6300 and discrete graphic card.


                +1

                To give you an idea what an FX-6300 can do for you ponching27, mine's clocked at 4.8Ghz using a h80i aio water cooler on a 990FXA-UD5 board. Using a Sapphire 7970 Ghz at stock speeds I'm averaging 70-75fps in BF3 set on Ultra.


                Not everyone can afford an H80i. For that kind of money you'd be better off with an FX 8320 and Hyper 212 EVO.


                I agree. I was just informing ponching27 what he could achieve if he decided to go with an h80i. The Hyper 212 evo is an awesome air cooler, I just wouldn't use to supplied paste. I would Noctua NT-H1 thermal paste instead. The FX-6300 can easily reach 4.4-4.5Ghz with the Hyper 212 evo. However I don't know what the FX-6300 will be able to reach using the msi 880gms e-41.
                  m
                  0
                  l
                  a b à CPUs
                  June 14, 2013 7:10:12 PM

                  andycal said:
                  montosaurous said:
                  andycal said:
                  qrad said:
                  Go for fx6300 and discrete graphic card.


                  +1

                  To give you an idea what an FX-6300 can do for you ponching27, mine's clocked at 4.8Ghz using a h80i aio water cooler on a 990FXA-UD5 board. Using a Sapphire 7970 Ghz at stock speeds I'm averaging 70-75fps in BF3 set on Ultra.


                  Not everyone can afford an H80i. For that kind of money you'd be better off with an FX 8320 and Hyper 212 EVO.


                  I agree. I was just informing ponching27 what he could achieve if he decided to go with an h80i. The Hyper 212 evo is an awesome air cooler, I just wouldn't use to supplied paste. I would Noctua NT-H1 thermal paste instead. The FX-6300 can easily reach 4.4-4.5Ghz with the Hyper 212 evo. However I don't know what the FX-6300 will be able to reach using the msi 880gms e-41.


                  Probably not too high of an OC on an 800 series chipset. Thermal Paste wise I prefer MX-4. 5c difference I've noticed from stock paste. And I would NOT recommend using any FX chip on anything less than a 970 board.
                    m
                    0
                    l
                    !
                    web counter